A TIMELINE FOR
THE PLANET click for Home Page
Mass extinctions are a feature of the planet’s
history. From time to time, a huge
upheaval occurs which kills off vast numbers of animals and plants. The magnitude of the extinction is not
measured by the number of deaths.
There’s no way of knowing this.
Instead it is measured by the number of species that disappear from the fossil record.
carbon isotope ratio
Organic biomarkers Cambrian extinction Ordovician extinction Ordovician diversification Late Devonian
extinction P-T extinction Triassic extinction K-T extinction
It’s been known for more than 200 years that these
mass extinctions happened.
Palaeontologists originally regarded them as gradual events, and
attributed them to various earthly upheavals, not fully understood.
Then, in 1980, along came the great physicist Luis
Alvarez, and his son Walter. They
proposed that the most famous extinction event, the one that killed off the
dinosaurs (except for the birds) was, on the
contrary, very sudden. It was caused by
a giant meteor strike. Other space
aficionados produced evidence that in fact all the five major extinction events
(which we’ll come on to) were produced by impacts or other astronomical
phenomena. And, because Alvarez was so
famous, we all had to believe it. But
gradually evidence began to accumulate that didn’t fit. At least two of the extinctions were long
drawn-out events after all. And the
space aficionados began to recant on some of their impact-evidence.
According to an article in New Scientist (8.12.07) there are two main causes of mass
extinctions, one cosmic and one earthly.
We all know about the Alvarez’s K-T event that we’ve just
mentioned. What is less well known
however are the Deccan Traps in
The most famous are the Siberian Traps of 250 million
years ago, which caused ‘the great dying’ of the P-T extinction. We’ll be coming on to it later.
What is striking however is that the magnitude of the
event itself seems to bear little relation to the magnitude of the extinction
that it causes. To be sure Alvarez’s Chicxulub impact seems to have been one of the
larger ones. And it did indeed cause a
significant extinction (though nothing like as great as you may have been led
to believe). But several other impacts,
not very much smaller, seem to have had no effect at all.
The ‘great dying’ was caused by 6 million cubic
kilometres of lava erupting over ?? years. But the incomparably greater Ontong Java
outpouring of some 120 million years ago produced 100 cubic kilometres of
basalt. And it caused “a minor marine
extinction”.
The explanation seems to lie in the location. The Chicxulub meteorite landed on a
continental shelf, rich in limestone, carbon-rich deposits and other
nasties. Other major asteroids landed on
ancient rocks that contained little carbon.
This must by why their effect was so slight.
And the Siberian traps also erupted through layers of
carbon-rich deposits, which would have produced carbon dioxide and the much
more potent greenhouse gas methane. But
that wasn’t all. There were also
chlorine-rich strata. The chlorine emanating
from these would have combined with the methane to produce the potent ozone
destroying gas methyl chloride. By
contrast the Ontong Java basalts flooded an area of the ocean floor, where
there will have been far less organic material to have been decomposed into
nasties. There was some of course. The ocean floor is being covered by
kilometres-deep deposits of mud and dead remains. It seems to have been enough to do some
mischief to marine life, but little more.
There’s more about a possible cause of some of the
worst mass extinctions at the bottom of the page.
An important line of evidence on extinction events is
the carbon isotope ratio. There are 3
different forms of carbon. The vast bulk
of the planet’s carbon is carbon-12. But
a tiny amount of carbon-14 is produced in the upper atmosphere by cosmic rays,
and it rains down to the surface.
Carbon-14 doesn’t interest us here.
But it’s slightly radioactive, and is useful in dating archaeological
finds.
We are more interested in the carbon-13. Carbon-13 is not radioactive, and it makes up
about 1% of the carbon on the planet.
Normal chemical reactions don’t care which isotope of carbon they are
dealing with. But what’s exciting about
carbon-13 is that life’s chemistry does care.
Life’s chemistry doesn’t really like carbon-13 because it doesn’t quite fit into the little niches in the enzymes that do its chemistry. So organic remains contain slightly less
carbon-13 than does inorganic carbon.
Scientists can analyse the carbon isotope ratio of a sample in great
detail, and can estimate how much once-living matter it contained.
The latest evidence is very Hi-Tech. Ancient microbes don’t leave fossils, except
in the most unusual conditions. But they
do often leave ‘organic biomarkers’; in particular the phospho-lipids that they make their cell membranes
with. These are made of tougher
stuff. Presumably it’s totally
indigestible to other microbes. And it
survives in the sediments. So
scientists can often get a handle on what microbes were around, and how many of
them, right back to the earliest times.
The most famous, and also most recent, extinction is
the one that killed off the terrestrial dinosaurs – the one that separates the
Cretaceous and Tertiary (or Palaeocene) periods. According to the N.S article it wiped out 50% of all species. Overall, as extinctions go, this makes it a
bit of a non-event. We think it was
important because it wiped out the terrestrial dinosaurs, and left the field
reasonably clear for us mammals. We had
been around for as long as the dinosaurs had.
But we couldn’t really compete with them and remained bit players until
they went. The flying dinosaurs – the
birds – would think it important because it wiped out the flying reptiles and
left the skies completely clear for them.
The insects would probably wonder what all the fuss was about.
The K-T event does genuinely seem to have been the
result of a meteor strike. It pains me
to say this, because the arrogance of my fellow physicists upsets me
greatly. But, the smoking gun has been
found. And the latest evidence, both
from carbon isotope ratios and the organic biomarkers, indicates that it was a
sudden event. The amount of plant life
dropped rapidly, but it recovered equally rapidly.
We should mention the great flood basalt outpourings
of the Deccan Traps, which we cover in more detail elsewhere.
These appear to have started before the strike, and to have continued
long after it. They used to be thought a
major cause of the extinction. But if it
had been, then neither the extinction nor the recovery would have been
sudden. Incidentally I’ve read recently
that it generally takes more than one dire event to cause many creatures
actually to go extinct.
The dinosaurs got their own big chance when the
previous extinction killed off most of the weird and wonderful ‘Triassic’ fauna. No doubt it killed off some species of
dinosaur too. But the dinosaurs
recovered and the Triassic fauna never really did. Over half the species of land animals died
out. It was also a major disaster for
marine life.
What caused it?
We discuss this in detail below.
The ‘from space’ aficionados favour an impact, of course. But I’m pleased to say that they seem to be
on a hiding to nothing with this one.
The recent evidence shows it to have been a long drawn out affair,
spanning hundreds of thousand of years.
There’s evidence of plant life suffering a number of disasters,
separated by gradual recoveries, lasting tens or even hundreds of thousands of
years. It may be significant that the
supercontinent of Pangaea was beginning
to break up around this time, setting off massive volcanic eruptions.
According to New
Scientist, the event was caused by ‘the
It seems to have been the T-J extinction that gave
flowering plants their opportunity.
Latest evidence suggests that they had been around for a while. But the extinction cleared the way for them
to become much bigger players.
Before the T-J event came ‘the great dying’, the worst
mass extinction since Cambrian explosion. It was the one that separated the
Permian from the Triassic period. Ninety
five percent and sixty six of land animal species went extinct. By contrast the plant kingdom suffered much
less.
The P-T extinction was another long drawn-out
event. It lasted 160,000 years.
This event also coincided with another great flood
basalt outpouring, this time the ‘Siberian Traps’. It was also during the life of the great
supercontinent of Pangaea. It cleared
the way for brand new flora and fauna to emerge, in particular the strange Triassic animals that preceded the dinosaurs.
The late Devonian extinction is a bit of a
mystery. It came in two bites about a
million years apart. And it wiped out at
least 70% of all marine animal species, but mainly in the tropics. What about the land animals? Well there weren’t any yet, apart from
creepy-crawlies.
And it doesn’t seem to be clear that there was any
major cataclysm to have caused it. Some
scientists blame global warming and others blame global cooling. More
recently a huge impact crater has been found in Australia. However there are a lot of impact craters
around, and relatively few of them are associated with extinctions.
Some palaeo-botanists reckon that the extinction was
caused by the evolution of trees. These
days of course, trees are credited with the exact opposite effect. But conditions then were quite
different. The massive tree roots broke
up the rocks and caused terrible erosion.
This released huge amounts of nutrients into the rivers and oceans and
created huge blooms of algae. The algae
took all the oxygen from the water and suffocated much of the marine life.
It was soon after this that the first fish invaded the
land (more). Maybe this isn’t a co-incidence. Before crawling out on to the mud, some fish
had already learned to breathe air to a certain extent. What better incentive to acquire this ability,
than living in water that was desperately short of oxygen?
This appears to have been the second worst event of
all time, when about 85% of species were wiped out.
Its cause also seems to be a bit of a mystery. It’s a
mystery that may never be solved, on account of it being so long ago.
There was an ice age on at the time. The Gondwana (Sahara) region was at the South
Pole, which helped ice sheets to form.
The sea level fell which uncovered large areas of coastal margins,
destroying rich coastal habitats. I was
surprised to read however, that it was also allegedly a time of high CO2,
which should have made it warm.
This is the event that gave vascular plants their big chance.
We keep telling you not to expect things to be simple
in this game. Here is an example of a
dramatic expansion of certain sea creatures – which is attributed to a smashed
up asteroid raining debris down on earth.
The diversification involved a group of sea-floor-dwelling
filter feeders that exploded into life’s biggest ever burst of evolutionary
variety. Other forms of marine life
don’t seem to have benefited from whatever gave these filter feeders their
dramatic leg up.
It seems that an asteroid collision caused the debris
rain. First came a cloud of dust. Then within ½ million years larger bits of
debris appeared. Later still the
incidence of crater-forming impacts rose 5- to 10-fold.
The timing is so perfect that the asteroid event
almost has to be the cause of the
diversification. The only snag is that
there is yet no convincing explanation of how these events could have brought
such huge benefits to just this single class of marine life. But that’s science for you.
The first extinction of, as it were, modern times came
quite shortly after the Cambrian explosion
itself. There will have been many before
then, in particular during the great Varangerian ice
age. But this far back, the fossil
record is sparse and difficult to read.
Information is sparse about the Cambrian event too,
and experts differ on exactly how severe it was. Some palaeo-biologists reckon that up to 80%
of all ‘genera’ disappeared. (I’m not
sure what the significance is of their being ‘genera’ and not ‘species’.) They all lived underwater because life hadn’t
invaded the land at that time. Others
point out that the event cannot have been too bad because the trilobites sailed through unscathed.
As we’ve seen there is no one cause of mass
extinctions. It’s now clear that the
famous K-T event was almost certainly caused by an impact from space. It may also have been helped by the massive
noxious outpourings from the Deccan traps.
The first three known extinctions, the Devonian,
Ordovician and Cambrian events, are all probably too long ago for any
particular cause to be established.
But the common cause of the more recent T-J and P-T
events is now becoming clearer. I reckon
that it’s reasonable to speculate that it could have had a hand in the earlier
extinctions too.
The process starts with global warming, triggered by
outpourings of CO2 caused by a flood basalt event. You tend to get
these events, plus a great deal of volcanism during certain stages of the supercontinent cycle. The volcanoes play their part but it’s the
flood basalts that do the real damage.
This global warming warms up the oceans. Now there are vast deposits of methane
hydrate lying around on the seabed today, and there probably always have
been. And it’s the cold water above it
that keeps it there. If the oceans warm up
too much, then incredible amounts of methane would be released into the
atmosphere. And methane is a far more
potent greenhouse gas than CO2.
So what may have started out as mildly serious global warming would
rapidly become deadly serious global heating.
Indeed the release of the current deposits is one of the fears that
scientists have for our future today.
But, according to an article in Scientific American (October 06), that’s not the
worst of it. And if it’s in Sci. Am. then you have to take it
seriously. This picture comes from the Sci. Am. article. The writing explains
the scenario in a little more detail than we do. To see a full-sized version, click on the
picture.
Serious global heating would release the H2S
(hydrogen sulphide) bugs. This is
terrible news because H2S is both a potent destroyer of the ozone
layer and also toxic to all life.
Without the ozone shield, UV radiation from the Sun destroys any life
that is left.
There are H2S bugs lying in wait in the
Black Sea, just waiting for a bout of global warming to release them. Why the Black Sea? Because it’s stagnant. Today’s oceans are
stirred up by the ocean currents, so that the entire water column shares in the
oxygen that is absorbed at the surface.
The H2S bugs can’t abide oxygen, so they don’t get a look in.
But presumably the Black Sea is too small to generate
these vital currents, and there’s a layer of oxygen-free water at the bottom,
that is home to a large population of oxygen-hating sulphur-eating bugs. They live at the bottom, turning the sulphur
into H2S. However, at the
boundary between the oxygen-free water and the oxygenated water above it, is a
population of H2S eaters. They operate their own form of photosynthesis. They too can’t abide oxygen, but they need
light to convert the H2S back into sulphur. The sulphur then rains down to the depths and
feeds the H2S makers.
These sulphur bugs operate a system almost equivalent
to the better known oxygen bugs. The famous
cyano-bacteria, other types of bacteria and of
course plants, use the energy of sunlight to split water into hydrogen and
oxygen. They use the hydrogen, and
excrete the oxygen as a waste product.
They die, and all sorts of scavenging bugs, and animals, effectively
burn the dead remains; obtaining the energy they need to live – and using up
oxygen in the process.
Periodic Table aficionados will not be surprised to
learn of this sulphur system; because sulphur is in the same group as oxygen,
one period down.
The boundary between the two waters is crucial. As the water warms, the boundary moves up
towards the surface. If it reaches the
surface then it’s Armageddon.
So far we’ve only talked about the Black Sea. But researchers have found biomarkers of
these H2S bugs in sea-floor deposits, from mass-extinction times,
all around the world. This indicates
that entire oceans became stagnant, and took part in the process we’ve just
described.
© C B Pease, February 08