A TIMELINE FOR THE PLANET click for Home page
Flight is
still a matter of hot debate. Insects did it first of course, followed by the
flying reptiles, and then birds. Finally, within the past 50 million years,
came mammals (bats).
This is a personal view, but I think that oxygen
levels will certainly have had a lot to do with it. There is nothing magic about our atmosphere’s
current 20% oxygen. The amount of oxygen
around could, and certainly did, vary widely down the ages (more).
More oxygen in the atmosphere would make it much
easier for not-yet-properly-adapted creatures to get airborne. It both enables them to get more oxygen to
their muscles and therefore to work them harder. And it makes the air denser (heavier) which
helps not-very-good wings to do the job.
Insects mastered flight during the Carboniferous
period, when you would certainly expect oxygen levels to be high. And they were. Huge dragonflies appeared twice. Both during oxygen-rich periods.
We know nothing about how or when reptiles acquired
flight. But the first birds certainly
appeared at a high-oxygen time.
Birds could have discovered flight ‘top-down’, gliding
down from trees, or ‘bottom-up’ jumping off the ground. Apparently there were no dinosaurs up trees,
so if you believe the former theory then you have to believe that birds are
descended from reptiles – the lizards and other small creatures that were
already up there. Note that we are not
talking about the flying reptiles, or pterosaurs,
here. They had been around as long as
the dinosaurs had. We are talking about
a new group of reptiles that may (or may not) have rediscovered flight and
evolved into modern birds. I don’t think
many scientists believe this.
The rest have to believe that it was the dinosaurs
that learned to fly by jumping up from the ground. Remember that they had already had feathers
about their persons for tens of millions of years. There are plenty of Web sites that will show
you modern birds – flightless or nearly flightless – using their wings to help
them run faster, climb steeper gradients or even to jump up. Remember also that there was more oxygen
around at this time.
We’ve discussed elsewhere,
the anatomical features that make birds so dinosaur-like. Many scientists insist that they are not just
descended from dinosaurs, they actually
are dinosaurs.
The first known bird was Archaeopteryx, which appeared during the late Jurassic, say 150
million years ago. These pictures are of a model in
But movement was afoot. Another ‘bird’ from the same time, Confuciusornis, had already lost its
heavy jawbones and teeth. By 115 million
years ago (say 30 million years after Archaeopteryx)
a much more bird-like creature appeared.
It was about the size of a goldfinch.
It was found in
This picture comes from however
that the tail has been artfully hidden (not by me). I found a skeletal reconstruction on the
Internet which suggests that the tail was still quite long and bony.
But E. hoyasi had
very bird-like wings, and something even more exciting. This is the little spike on its wing marked
‘A’ in the picture. It is not a claw,
like Archaeopteryx or Confuciusornis sported. This is an ‘alula’ or bastard wing. Now ‘bastard wing’ must be one of the most
ill-named features in the history of anatomy.
The alula is in fact an aerodynamic flap. It’s the magic fitment that enables all
modern birds to fly slowly and to manoeuvre in tight places. (Modern aircraft have ‘leading edge’ flaps to
do the same thing.) And E hoyasi was the first to sport it. It also had ‘perching’ claws – rather useful
if you’re a small bird preferring to live in the trees. So everything about E. hoyasi except its tail is very much ‘modern bird’.
Apparently the fossil record of early bird-kind is
pretty meagre. Their hollow bones
normally rot away very quickly. But most
if not all the essential features of modern birds, including their feathered
aerodynamic tails, have been found from the ‘early Cretaceous’. This must be around the same time as E. hoyasi or very soon afterwards.
A birdwatcher from somewhat later, 65 Million years
ago, will have seen a wide range of birds looking remarkably similar to those
of today. (This comes from, I think, the Berkeley Website. And I assume that we are talking about before the K-T crash.)
In addition to losing their heavy jawbones, teeth and
long bony tails, I reckon that the pressure will also have been on for birds to
keep their brains small and light. A
flying machine really does not need a heavy dead weight right out at the front
on a stalk.
And yet birds may have had to increase their
intelligence fast. Some scientists have
developed sophisticated theories about the relationship between intelligence
and brain size (more). I don’t see how these theories could possibly
apply to birds. Some modern birds are
seriously bright, but I’ve not read that their brains are any bigger. Be prepared for it to turn out that birds’
brains are considerably more efficient than ours.
© C B Pease, Sept, 07