A TIMELINE FOR THE PLANET click for Home Page
Rock and cave paintings are basically the same, and seem to have served
very similar purposes. The only
difference is that rock paintings are outside, and don’t preserve as well as
cave paintings.
Fumane cave Chauvet cave Lascaux cave
Since all early human developments seem to have started in better preservation
conditions in
The mountainous areas of
Although we will be concentrating on
According to Wikipedia, rock paintings have been found dating back to the ‘Upper (later)
Palaeolithic’ 40 ky ago. Unfortunately
the article didn’t tell us where these very old paintings are.
The oldest example I’ve found so far is Fumane cave on
the southern edge of the
It looks pretty primitive, compared to the rich
imagery, from later times, that we are used to. So although the dating of such things is not
as certain as is sometimes claimed, the scientists are happy with this one.
Another example is Chauvet Cave in southern
France. The Chauvet paintings are
altogether more controversial. The paintings
are exquisite, and fully up to the standard that we have come to expect. This
one, of a cave bear, even has shading to bring out the detail. And yet radio carbon dating says that
they are nearly as old as the Fumane paintings, at 30 ky.
Many scientists refuse to accept this date, and deny that the Chauvet
paintings can be much more than some 15 ky old.
But we’re entitled to wonder whether they are being a bit hasty. Both cultural and technological developments
tend to come in spurts (even if the spurts aren’t always as sudden as they at
first appear). Think stone tool kits for
example (more).
Or the Industrial revolution. One
minute everything had to be done by muscle power. The next, steam was harnessed and mankind was
freed for ever (hopefully) from this cruel limitation.
In the case of the Chauvet caves we’re probably still talking a few
thousand years or so, equal to a hundred generations or more. That’s plenty of time for huge advances. Think how much has changed since the Romans.
But the sceptics could be right.
Radio carbon dating is a difficult technique. And it can lie if it’s not done
properly. First, the sample has to be
big enough. The specks of carbon scraped
off the walls for the dating of cave art tend to be incredibly tiny. So there just aren’t that many carbon atoms
for producing a definitive result.
Second, in important cases it’s vital that the results are cross checked
by at least one other lab. It seems that
all the dating work for Chauvet cave was done by a single lab in France.
There is certainly a case to answer here. We will have to wait and see what transpires.
Lascaux is perhaps
the most famous of the palaeolithic caves.
So famous indeed, that it had to be closed to the public because the
paintings were deteriorating. Instead a
replica has been created for us ordinary folk to visit. Lascaux is also allegedly the oldest of the
European ‘fine art’ caves (if you ignore Chauvet that is). The oldest paintings have been dated to
around 17 ky, and the youngest some 15 ky.
This picture is so good that I suspect it comes from the replica cave.
© C B Pease, December 07